In my employment law classes at Penn State, I have used a certain "go to" case to illustrate the high bar of establishing "opprobrious" conduct. The employee posted (earmuffs kids, it's about to get PG-13):
Bob (his supervisor) is such a NASTY MOTHER FUCKER don’t know how to talk to people!!!!!! Fuck his mother and his entire fucking family!!!! What a LOSER!!!!
Vote YES for the UNION!!!!!!He got fired and filed a charge with the NLRB.

Now, here we are. Last week, the Second Circuit upheld the NLRB decision in NLRB v. Pier Sixty, LLC. Yes, a Circuit Court of Appeals actually held that an employee could not be fired for calling his boss a "nasty mother fucker" and posting "Fuck his mother and his entire fucking family" on Facebook.
This seems facially absurd, but I'll offer a tepid defense of the Court's decision: (1) courts apply a deferential standard of review to NLRB rulings; (2) there was an upcoming union election and evidence of additional anti-union animus (the employer allegedly threatened to rescind benefits and terminate employees who voted for unionization); (3) other employees cursed all the time and did not get fired; and (4) the online forum (Facebook) did not disrupt the workplace.
But remember kids, that's just one circuit, and we live in the Third Circuit. Also, there's a new NLRB in town, so I doubt it would hold the same way (that said, see my dismal track record for predictions above).
No comments:
Post a Comment