tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-569140567104079936.post119447985284554176..comments2009-12-07T10:17:12.442-05:00Philip Mileshttps://profiles.google.com/104787858732808759480noreply@blogger.comBlogger1125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-569140567104079936.post-69748013558808455622009-12-07T10:06:58.735-05:002009-12-07T10:06:58.735-05:00Hobbie is a disqualification case rather than an eligibility case like Sherbert, and should be so analyzed. The question is whether the employer was at fault in the termination. If the employer had a statutory duty to accommodate the religious views of the employee, then the employer is at fault, and the employee is entitled to benefits. For the STATE to then deny benefits would be a violation of the First Amendment.Anonymousnoreply@blogger.com